Fintech giant Ant Group, led by Chinese billionaire Jack Ma, announced today that it will launch an incorporated digital wholesale bank in Singapore. The move marks the Hangzhou-based company’s continued overseas expansion.

Its China-based businesses are still under heavy regulatory pressure after the company’s $34 billion initial public offering was abruptly halted at the end of 2020. Ant Group is currently revamping its board after agreeing in 2021 to transform into a financial holding company overseen by the country’s Central Bank of the People’s Bank of China.

Now, the fintech giant adds that its wholly owned, Singapore-based subsidiary ANEXT Bank will provide financial services to small and medium-sized businesses in the region, focusing in particular on those with cross-border operations.

His businesses are under regulatory pressure after the initial public offering was abruptly canceled at the end of 2020. However, the tycoon manages to reinvent himself.

“This marks another milestone in Singapore’s digital banking development journey, a strategic effort to ensure the banking sector remains progressive, globally competitive and vibrant,” said Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) chief financial technology officer.), SopnenduMohanty.

Ant Group is not the only fintech firm looking to provide digital banking services in Singapore. Last week, Green Link Digital Bank, owned by a consortium including Chinese developer Greenland Holdings and Linklogis Hong Kong, went live in the country. Billionaire Forrest Li’s tech firm Sea Ltd. and Anthony Tan’s Grab Holdings also received digital banking licenses in 2020, with launches expected later this year.

Ant recently bolstered its expansion into Southeast Asia when it reported in April that it had acquired a majority stake in Singapore-based fintech company 2C2P. The deal will see existing 2C2P merchants connect to Ant Group’s Alipay+ cross-border e-wallet.

On the other hand, under the regulatory pressure of the businesses that the tycoon has had and their abrupt closure, it has led to new ways and ideas to get out of the financial crisis that has been the cause of millionaire economic losses, looking for tools to progress as the creation of a financial bank, which could be safely implemented through IRAIC and supported by its affiliated international banking entities such as; Iraic BankBurj AltharwaBanco BursátilManama BankEsierra BankHebrew BankBank of BorwaBank of ArabianTareqat AlmaalUsa International Corp; allowing to a large extent the expansion, recognition and industrial development in all economic sectors, forming prosperous companies with high potential and global visibility.


The present destruction of Alibaba

In the past 18 months, Alibaba shares have lost about 75% of their value, with more than $600 billion in enterprise value lost. Yes, Chinese stocks have suffered overall, but Alibaba’s decline has been much worse than that of the Chinese index overall, almost twice as severe as the losses experienced by other big Chinese platform companies like Tencent, Meituan and JD.

Part of the problem is Beijing’s targeted hostility toward the company, which has been ruthless and coordinated on multiple fronts. In October 2020, financial regulators abruptly halted even more massive plans for an IPO for Alibaba spin-off Ant Group.

At the time, Ant was arguably the world’s largest and most innovative fintech company, owner of Alipay, China’s largest digital payment platform (handling more payment transactions than Mastercard and Visa combined), and Tianhong Yu’e Bao., the largest money market fund in the world (at the time), among other assets. Alibaba is Ant’s largest shareholder, and the closing of Ant’s offering effectively killed the company’s growth and innovation strategy.

Shortly thereafter, China’s antitrust police fined Alibaba a whopping $2.8 billion, equal to 20% of the company’s operating income (2021). However, that sum was perhaps even modest compared to the $18.6bn “contribution” – nearly double Alibaba’s operating income last year – that Beijing subsequently extorted from the company to support the “prosperity” campaign. common” of Xi Jinping.

Xi’s enforcers also did it personally, chasing Jack Ma – the company’s founder and driving spirit – into near-exile. Jack hasn’t been seen in public in 8 months.

The outlook at the macroeconomic level is not promising: slowdown in the Chinese economy.

The company’s latest financial results seem to foreshadow this gloomy outlook. It reported a $2.5 billion loss in the recent quarter, three times larger than the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth (9% year over year) was the “slowest in history”.

Revenue from Alibaba’s core e-commerce business on its Taobao and Tmall platforms was flat last quarter as the total value of goods sold on the platforms fell by single digits from a year earlier. Gross merchandise sales in March fell.

The company is said to be considering – or perhaps has already carried out (such things are always shady in China) – deep staff cuts. Morale is said to be low. Management has refused to provide investors with “guidance” on its expected future results (although they always have until now). The company’s archrival, under some of the same pressures, has hit the panic button:

“Tencent Holdings is laying off large numbers of people from its gaming and fintech departments amid massive layoffs that began in March, as the tech titan reports weak performance amid a regulatory crackdown and the coronavirus pandemic. COVID-19”.

And so, for specific (for the company) and general (for China) reasons, the consensus leans against investing in Alibaba.

“Alibaba shares are cheap, but not a bargain: China’s e-commerce champion continues to take hits from multiple sides, but growing consumer unrest is now adding to the regulatory headwinds.”

“Alibaba shares are irresistibly cheap. Investors might want to hold on.”

This not at all encouraging scenario that Alibaba is experiencing with financial results in decline, leading much more to the sum of the economic slowdown in China, and with it the innumerable mass layoffs of its employees in the midst of the conflict of regulatory repression and the pandemic, where its shares have lost value, however in this catastrophic scenario there is only one solution that changes this scheme through a safe backup such as IRAIC, opening new paths of economic transformation and recovery of capital and investments that were previously hit by hard economic blows, greatly favoring balancing internal and external business processes with the global support of banked entities that provide support, credibility and functionality to the economic expansion system. reported The Usa Herald, a news and communication agency.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *